imported>HRWikiMirrorBot: Reimported from hrwiki.org Wayback HTML→wikitext (full reconvert)

2026-07-18T21:00:57Z

Reimported from hrwiki.org Wayback HTML→wikitext (full reconvert)

imported>HRWikiMirrorBot: Reimported from hrwiki.org Wayback HTML→wikitext (full reconvert)

2026-07-18T17:00:33Z

Reimported from hrwiki.org Wayback HTML→wikitext (full reconvert)

New page

'''This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here. Click [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection|here]] to go back to the main FAS historical page.'''

----

<br />

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Week
! Article
! Discussion
|-
| '''[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 31]] (Jul 30–Aug 5)'''
| [[cliffhangers]]
| [#cliffhangers discussion]
|-
| '''[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 32]] (Aug 6–12)'''
| [[Population: Tire]]
| [#Population:_Tire discussion]
|-
| '''[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 33]] (Aug 13–19)'''
| [[Not the 100th Email]]
| [#Not_the_100th_Email discussion]
|-
| '''[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 34]] (Aug 20–26)'''
| Redirects - [[alternate universe]]
| [#Redirects discussion]
|-
| '''[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 35]] (Aug 27–Sep 2)'''
| [[Career Day]]
| [#Career_Day discussion]
|-
| '''[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 36]] (Sep 3–9)'''
| Redirects - [[Labor Dabor]]
| [#Redirects discussion]
|-
| '''[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 37]] (Sep 10–16)'''
| Redirects - [[Coach Z]]
| [#Redirects discussion]
|-
| '''[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 38]] (Sep 17–23)'''
| [[The Virus]]
| [#The_Virus discussion]
|-
| '''[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 39]] (Sep 24–30)'''
| Redirects - [[Kicking The Cheat]]
| [#Redirects discussion]
|-
| '''[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 40]] (Oct 1–7)'''
| [[Coach Z's Problems]]
| [#Coach_Z.27s_Problems discussion]
|}

=== Redirects ===

This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:

<pre>
{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}
</pre>

Example:

<pre>
{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}
</pre>

Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.

=== cliffhangers ===

''https://web.archive.org/web/20211001000000im_/http://www.hrwiki.org/w/images/4/47/Done.png [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 31]] (Jul 30–Aug 5)''

We've featured the second and third parts of the Lappy-napped trilogy, so how about featuring the first? '''[[User:RickTommy|Rick]][[User talk:RickTommy|Tommy]] [/wiki/Special:Contributions/RickTommy (edits)]''' 12:00, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

I'll unstall this too and give it a vote of approval as well for the ending of this sbemail. — [[User:Ngamer01|Ngamer01]] 15:43, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Well jakeula, let's feature this and then go get those hushpuppies! — '''''[[User:DeFender1031|Defender1031]]*[[User talk:DeFender1031|Talk]]''''' 16:16, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
I support this, but I don't support featuring these out of order. this one should be featured first, then Lappynapped!, then retirement. but i guess there's not much we can do about that now. i guess Dangeresque 2 was technically released to the public before Dangeresque 1 was, so going out of order wouldn't be unprecedented. But really, i'd like to see this featured in a self-demonstrating matter. And it would be more effective if this one was the first one featured. https://web.archive.org/web/20211001000000im_/http://www.hrwiki.org/w/images/thumb/8/8e/JustOnionBubs.png/20px-JustOnionBubs.png[[User:The Knights Who Say Ni|The Knight]][/wiki/Special:Contributions/The_Knights_Who_Say_Ni s Who] [[User talk:The Knights Who Say Ni|Say Ni]] https://web.archive.org/web/20211001000000im_/http://www.hrwiki.org/w/images/thumb/6/68/sbeyes.PNG/20px-sbeyes.PNG 19:44, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
I think the other two have ALREADY been featured, sadly. — '''''[[User:DeFender1031|Defender1031]]*[[User talk:DeFender1031|Talk]]''''' 22:19, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
RickTommy made that clear in the original suggestion to feature this article. what is in silver is not important in regard to the given circumstances. https://web.archive.org/web/20211001000000im_/http://www.hrwiki.org/w/images/thumb/8/8e/JustOnionBubs.png/20px-JustOnionBubs.png[[User:The Knights Who Say Ni|The Knight]][/wiki/Special:Contributions/The_Knights_Who_Say_Ni s Who] [[User talk:The Knights Who Say Ni|Say Ni]] https://web.archive.org/web/20211001000000im_/http://www.hrwiki.org/w/images/thumb/6/68/sbeyes.PNG/20px-sbeyes.PNG 03:50, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

=== Population: Tire ===

''https://web.archive.org/web/20211001000000im_/http://www.hrwiki.org/w/images/4/47/Done.png [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 32]] (Aug 6–12)''

It's been quite some time since we've done a game. '''[[User:RickTommy|Rick]][[User talk:RickTommy|Tommy]] [/wiki/Special:Contributions/RickTommy (edits)]''' 13:05, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't think there's enough content to feature. — '''''[[User:DeFender1031|Defender1031]]*[[User talk:DeFender1031|Talk]]''''' 15:36, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|Not so. I mean, there is so.]] '''[[User:RickTommy|Rick]][[User talk:RickTommy|Tommy]] [/wiki/Special:Contributions/RickTommy (edits)]''' 13:44, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
After I fixed up some grammar and awkward wording, and added [[User:Phlip|Phlip]]'s Homebrew version of the game being featured, it seems you may be right. — '''''[[User:DeFender1031|Defender1031]]*[[User talk:DeFender1031|Talk]]''''' 16:16, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Good enough to feature now. I add my support to this.. — [[User:Ngamer01|Ngamer01]] 20:10, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

=== Not the 100th Email ===

''https://web.archive.org/web/20211001000000im_/http://www.hrwiki.org/w/images/4/47/Done.png [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 33]] (Aug 13–19)''

''Original title: [[Not the 100th Email]], [[Sbemail 150?!?]], or [[Sbemail 200 Fakeout|Page Load Error]]''

As teasers to milestone e-mails, I believe that one of them should be featured. [/wiki/Special:Contributions/124.181.68.22 124.181.68.22] 13:17, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

I'd say Not the 100th Email. '''[[User:RickTommy|Rick]][[User talk:RickTommy|Tommy]] [/wiki/Special:Contributions/RickTommy (edits)]''' 07:20, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Start with the first one, makes sense. Although it is very short. --[/wiki/Special:Contributions/93.207.87.212 93.207.87.212] 08:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC) (That Anonny Guy)
Anon makes a good point. Not the 100th Email is rather short. Would we be able to expand that enough to make a quality write-up? '''[[User:DENNIS|DENNIS]][[User talk:DENNIS|T]]/[/wiki/Special:Contributions/DENNIS C]''' 08:40, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
I've drafted a quality write-up: [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts#Not the 100th Email]]. '''[[User:RickTommy|Rick]][[User talk:RickTommy|Tommy]] [/wiki/Special:Contributions/RickTommy (edits)]''' 06:46, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
THe proposed write up is far too flowery and just makes me go "uch". No. — '''''[[User:DeFender1031|Defender1031]]*[[User talk:DeFender1031|Talk]]''''' 00:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
I've trimmed it down a bit. '''[[User:RickTommy|Rick]][[User talk:RickTommy|Tommy]] [/wiki/Special:Contributions/RickTommy (edits)]''' 13:05, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
I didn't say it was too long. I said it was flowery and made me go "uch". The stuff you removed were among the less objectionable parts of it in my opinion. — '''''[[User:DeFender1031|Defender1031]]*[[User talk:DeFender1031|Talk]]''''' 15:36, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
I've revised it. '''[[User:RickTommy|Rick]][[User talk:RickTommy|Tommy]] [/wiki/Special:Contributions/RickTommy (edits)]''' 13:44, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
New version looks good. I'll give this my approval. — '''''[[User:DeFender1031|Defender1031]]*[[User talk:DeFender1031|Talk]]''''' 16:16, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
I approve as well. It'll make a good feature. — [[User:Ngamer01|Ngamer01]] 20:10, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

=== Career Day ===

''https://web.archive.org/web/20211001000000im_/http://www.hrwiki.org/w/images/4/47/Done.png [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 35]] (Aug 27–Sep 2)''

It's the only big toon (apart from the 2-Part Episodes) that hasn't been featured yet. '''[[User:RickTommy|Rick]][[User talk:RickTommy|Tommy]] [/wiki/Special:Contributions/RickTommy (edits)]''' 13:58, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

I'll go along with this. I enjoyed the art style for SB's educational short and the ending is funny. — [[User:Ngamer01|Ngamer01]] 15:43, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Gives us a better look into strong bad's made-uppy space program. Let's feature in T-minus the heck outta dodge! — '''''[[User:DeFender1031|Defender1031]]*[[User talk:DeFender1031|Talk]]''''' 16:16, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

=== The Virus ===

''https://web.archive.org/web/20211001000000im_/http://www.hrwiki.org/w/images/4/47/Done.png [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 38]] (Sep 17–23)''

The Virus! The Virus! --[/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gfdgsgxgzgdrc https://web.archive.org/web/20211001000000im_/http://www.hrwiki.org/w/images/thumb/a/a2/Strong_Bad_in_small_picture_frame.png/18px-Strong_Bad_in_small_picture_frame.png] '''[[User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc|Gfdgsgxg]][[User talk:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc|zgdrc]]''' 14:46, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

This article might need a bit more expansion before getting featured. [[User:Doctorwho295|doctorwho295]] 00:38, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
[[User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/Draft|Hmmmmm...You are correctly correct...maybe]]. --[/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gfdgsgxgzgdrc https://web.archive.org/web/20211001000000im_/http://www.hrwiki.org/w/images/thumb/a/a2/Strong_Bad_in_small_picture_frame.png/18px-Strong_Bad_in_small_picture_frame.png] '''[[User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc|Gfdgsgxg]][[User talk:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc|zgdrc]]''' 01:19, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Actually, I think that draft is adequate. '''[[User:RickTommy|Rick]][[User talk:RickTommy|Tommy]] [/wiki/Special:Contributions/RickTommy (edits)]''' 10:44, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
I'd add a bit more information before I think it's ready for primetime, but i think it's on the right track. I'll support this and add to the draft a bit later. — '''''[[User:DeFender1031|Defender1031]]*[[User talk:DeFender1031|Talk]]''''' 11:18, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
There. I modified the draft. I think she's a lookin pretty good there, strang bad! — '''''[[User:DeFender1031|Defender1031]]*[[User talk:DeFender1031|Talk]]''''' 11:32, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Supporting. It looks like a winner to me. — [[User:Ngamer01|Ngamer01]] 18:35, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

=== Coach Z's Problems ===

''https://web.archive.org/web/20211001000000im_/http://www.hrwiki.org/w/images/4/47/Done.png [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 40]] (Oct 1–7)''

It's the last of the three really great lists on this wiki about fundamental portions of a character's personality that hasn't yet been featured (the other two being [[Bubs's Shady Business Practices]] and [[Crimes Committed by Strong Bad]]). I really like this trio of lists because the fundamental personality can be itemized into categories, and the pages elucidate each instance of each category. — '''''[[User:DeFender1031|Defender1031]]*[[User talk:DeFender1031|Talk]]''''' 17:50, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Draft looks fine to me. I support it. — [[User:Ngamer01|Ngamer01]] 18:06, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Wow. I can't believe that an article I created has been nominated for featuring. For this reason, I support it, too. '''[[User:RickTommy|Rick]][[User talk:RickTommy|Tommy]] [/wiki/Special:Contributions/RickTommy (edits)]''' 13:26, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
RickTommy, for the last time, '''do not put things in the cue or create featured articles less than a week beforehand'''. Oh, and just to be clear, '''I''' was the one who [[Coach Z|cleaned up the section on the original article and made the content what it is today]] after [[Talk:Coach Z|extensively detailing the changes on the talk page]] and it's an accomplishment that I'm rather proud of as well. You, on the other hand, simply copied it from the original page onto a new page [[Talk:Coach Z's Problems|without even discussing it first]] and simply got lucky after the fact that the rest of us agreed that it happened to be a good move. I don't appreciate you claiming credit for my work, thanks very much. — '''''[[User:DeFender1031|Defender1031]]*[[User talk:DeFender1031|Talk]]''''' 17:57, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40 - Revision history

imported>HRWikiMirrorBot: Reimported from hrwiki.org Wayback HTML→wikitext (full reconvert)

imported>HRWikiMirrorBot: Reimported from hrwiki.org Wayback HTML→wikitext (full reconvert)